Ordered to eat in a hoker. Portion for 4.50 (didn't want a lot of pasta), but asked to add (double) oysters, squid, egg, shrimp paying extra 6.70. Total 11.20. What do we see on the advertisement for 4.50? What do I get for 11.20? A bunch of pasta and half an egg on top? They saw the angmo and decided that he would be delighted to eat this slop? The white man won't be here for long, won't he complain? How I feel sorry for the HDB people who have to eat it all the time. Michelin, give this restaurant a star for being rude. #TikTokSG #Singapore #StreetFood #Asia #Micheline #MichelinGuide #FoodPorn
Заказал есть в хокере. Порция за 4.50 (много пасты не хотелось), но попросил добавить (двойные) устрицы, кальмары, яйцо, креветки, доплатив 6.70. Итого 11.20. Что мы видим на рекламе за 4.50? Что я получу за 11.20? Куча макарон и пол яйца сверху? Увидели иностранца и решили, что он с удовольствием съест эту помойку? Белый человек не задержится здесь надолго, не будет он жаловаться? Как же мне жалко людей из HDB, которым приходится постоянно это есть. Мишлен, дайте этому ресторану звезду за грубость.
I love finding technical errors, I love auditing systems, I love stress testing. I fucking love advising people by poking their noses into their shortcomings before the client points them out. But when a simple trip to the Singapore Zoo for my daughter's birthday turns my child into a puppet to test the latest bugs in Mandai Zoo's access system designers, I start to wonder. Today I learned first hand that the gates at the entrance to the zoo do not know that there is a baby in a stroller in the area of their closing. Now I have a sleepless night. I hope that there is no crack in the bone, that the child has not received a hidden injury. The only thing I am now sure of is a couple of questions: how in Singapore, a high-tech country of the "first world", at a large facility that is visited annually by more than 1.5 million visitors, none of the staff has noticed so far that the gate tends to close until the passage is full visitor? Who accepted such an object, signed the document on the working capacity, and is responsible for the safety of visitors? Was there really no technical task and testing of equipment before the launch of visitors? Is this really happening in Singapore?
UPD:
I analyzed the situation, I established the cause of the premature closing of the gate. The zookeeper attached a second ticket before the first visitor passed, forcing the gate to go through a close-open cycle. Why is Singapore hiring staff with no basic skills? Yes, I've taken into account your previous "get out of Singapore" comments, thanks. I myself am afraid for the safety of children in this country, so I think you are right.